Does your technology plan tied together with your long
term strategy?
What's more, a recent Forrester survey found that although 50% of firms say
that investing in systems to improve engagement with customers and partners is
a high or critical priority, the majority see workforce computing technology as
a cost and risk center, instead of an enormous opportunity for competitive
advantage. Why? Because there is seldom a clear destination in mind, a rational
plan to get there, and a viable system in place to execute the plan. Most of
the time, the destination and the means to get there are only vague estimates,
and the elements of strategy are rooted in hope.
David Johnson
4 Key Elements: Strategic
IT Plans
Information Week
Too often, companies view technology as a cost to avoid
unless necessary. This results in
multiple systems within the company – each purchased to optimize a particular
department or function, but don’t strategically fit together very well.
Before you can have a well define, robust IT strategy, you
need a well define long term strategy.
Then you can tie your IT plan to your long term strategy.
Many studies indicate that over 80% of all new technology
system investments fail to live up to expectations. And, as more and more of the IT system
spending "exits" the IT department, it will only get worse.
Companies have to hold IT and
Marketing systems accountable just like any other part of the operations. So
investment upgrades in these systems should focus on:
·
New opportunities in new markets by adding capabilities companies
currently don’t have.
·
Increased revenue
·
Decreasing cost
·
Increasing productivity
Five things will help insure that your IT and Marketing
system projects come in on time and on budget.
1.
Make sure that you have a well define set of
requirements, with critical dates, budgets, and check offs that everyone agrees
to before any work starts on the project.
This will prevent scope creep and help keep the current budget under
control. In reality, this may take up to 25% of the time for the project
implementation if done correctly.
2.
Assign an Executive Management sponsor to oversee the
project. Make sure that regular updates are provide to the Executive team and
critical deadlines and milestones are hit.
3.
Put someone in charge of the project that has relevant
experience.
4.
Insure extensive testing is done.
5.
Do one let the deadline drive the implementation schedule.
Especially do not pick a dead and then work backwards to determine the
schedule.
Virtually no IT or marketing systems
have failed due to a technology issue. It seems that all the systems failures
studied fail due to a process implementation issue.
Anywhere else in the organization,
this would not be tolerated. Yet again and again, studies indicate that up to
60% of all IT system implementations either fail to deliver the promised
results, hit the deadline, or over run the budget by more than 50%.
IT Investment Questions to Consider:
·
Has the project requirements truly been scoped out and everyone agreed to
these requirements?
·
Do we have the right person leading the project implementation team?
·
Can we live with it if this project goes over budget by 50% or takes 50%
longer than plan?
·
Has the opportunity and threat from IT been quantified by business unit and
by market?
·
If so, how much?
·
And whose head is on the chopping block to make these numbers (revenue,
cost) work?
·
Do our current plans reflect that opportunity?
·
Do our current plans minimize any threat?
·
What are the risks we are taking OR not taking by accepting this level of
investment?
·
Do our investments in IT match our strategic plans?
·
How do they match up?
·
What capabilities do this provide that we do not currently have?
·
How can we compete better, stronger, faster, in which new markets due to
this investment?
·
How long will it take?
CASE STUDY - HOW DANGEROUS ARE IT PROJECTS?
Why Your IT Project May Be Riskier Than You Think
An alarming study by Flyvbjerg and Budzier published in the Harvard Business Review has made everyone
stand-up and take notice. The coherent advice being that IT projects are much
more riskier than we think.
"When we broke down the
projects’ cost overruns, what we found surprised us. The average overrun was
27%—but that figure masks a far more alarming one. Graphing the projects’
budget overruns reveals a “fat tail”—a large number of gigantic overages. Fully
one in six of the projects we studied was a black swan, with a cost overrun of
200%, on average, and a schedule overrun of almost 70%.
This highlights the true
pitfall of IT change initiatives: It’s not that they’re particularly prone to
high cost overruns on average, as management
consultants and academic studies have previously suggested. It’s that an
unusually large proportion of them incur massive overages—that is, there are a
disproportionate number of black swans.
By focusing on averages
instead of the more damaging outliers, most managers and consultants have been
missing the real problem."
HBR, Sept, 2011